Ponraj.K v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.03.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI K.Ponraj ... Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The District Collector, Dindigul.

2.Tahsildar, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District.

... Respondents P RAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to consider petitioner's representation dated 05.12.2022 and survey and issue patta for the plots bearing Plot Nos.16,17, 18 carved out from a larger extent of lands, comprising southern 94 cents of 5 acre 38 cents in S.No.683/2, 93 cents in S.No.589/1, western 1 acre 98 cents of 2 acre 88 cents in S.No.590/1 totally 3 acres 85 cents in Vedasanthur Village, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District.

1/3

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Arun Kumar For R1 & R2 : Mrs.S.Jeyapriya Government Advocate

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner's representation has been considered and therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the writ petition.

2. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as nothing survives. No costs. Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No 06.03.2025 am To 1.The District Collector, Dindigul.

2.Tahsildar, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District.

2/3

P.B. BALAJI , J.

am Order made in Dated:

06.03.2025 3/3