Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15007/2020allowed

Packiam v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-21Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15007 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15007 of 2020 1.Packiam 2.Moses Pennaya 3.Jayasingh ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Special Wing for Anti-Land Grabbing, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

(Crime No.87 of 2011) 2.G.Selvaraj ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the charge sheet filed by the first respondent in C.C.No.2 of 2016 on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Vashik Ali For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

For R2 : Mr.R.Murugan

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the charge sheet filed by the first respondent in C.C.No.2 of 2016 on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli.

2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioners would pray for quashing the charge sheet filed by the first respondent in C.C.No.2 of 2016 on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli.

3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today(21.12.2020) and the defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15007 of 2020 been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise. The parties were identified by the Inspector of Police, Special Wing for Anti-Land Grabbing, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the charge sheet filed by the first respondent in C.C.No.2 of 2016 on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. gns Sd/- Assistant Registrar (crl.side) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To ENCL:Xerox Copy of Joint Compromise Memo.

1.The Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Land Grabbing Cases, Tirunelveli 2.The Inspector of Police, Special Wing for Anti-Land Grabbing, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1CC to Mr.R.Murugan,SR.No.26749 dated 22/12/2020 +1Cc to Mr.S.Vashik Ali,SR.No.26748 dated 22/12/2020 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15007 of 2020 21.12.2020 SJ(CO) KB(08.01.2021) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2