S.Murugesan, S/O.Singaram v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.[MD]No.3999 of 2016 S.Murugesan : Petitioner Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Secretary to Government, Electricity Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Trichy Distribution Circle, Metro TNEB Complex, Mannarpuram, Tiruchirappalli-620 020.
: Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's request for providing death benefits of petitioner's deceased daughter M.Nandhini, worked as Field Assistant under the second respondent and also to provide compassionate appointment to the petitioner's younger daughter considering his representation dated 10.02.2016. For Petitioner : M/s.T.Banumathy For Respondent No.1 : Mr.C.M.Mari Chellaiah Prabhu, Special Government Pleader For Respondent No.2 : Mr.S.M.S.Johnny Basha
O R D E R
The prayer in the Writ Petition is to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's request for providing death benefits of his deceased daughter M.Nandhini, worked as Field Assistant under the second respondent and also to provide compassionate appointment to his younger daughter, considering his representation dated 10.02.2016.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. Heard the submissions made on either side.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner's daughter by name M.Nandhini was working as Field Assistant in the second respondent Division. She got married to one Manikandan on 12.06.2013, but, within 9 days of her marriage, she committed suicide due to dowry harassment. Since she died while in service and she was the caretaker of the family, the petitioner made a representation dated 10.02.2016 to the second respondent seeking death benefits and also appointment on compassionate ground to his younger daughter. However, the same is kept pending without any order being passed. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition seeking the aforesaid reliefs.
4. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent submits that the representation of the petitioner dated 10.02.2016 would be considered on merits within the time stipulated by this Court.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case also also having regard to the submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the second respondent, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.02.2016, if not considered earlier and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS III) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) SML To The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu,Electricity Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
1CC TO MRS. T. BANUMATHI, ADVOCATE SR 56716 1CC TO THE SPL GOVT PLEADER 57181 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ DS - 29/04/2019 - 2P 4C Order made in W.P.[MD]No.3999 of 2016