← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11249/2025allowed

Sri Vaishnavi v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thiruverambur

2025-07-04Honourable Mr Justice P.Vadamalai5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04.07.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI Sri Vaishnavi NS ( F/36) W/o.Muthukumar ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs State of Tamilnadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thiruverumbur, Tirchy District.

(Crime No.20 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Suresh For Respondent :

Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.20 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.

1/5

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC altered into Sections 75(1)(i) and 351(2) of BNS and 67 of Information Technology Act, r/w 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.20 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and her husband came to the house of the defacto complainant and mixed sedative medicine in the defacto complainant's milk shake, due to which, she became unconscious and A1 took photos. Further, A1 showing those photographs to the defacto complainant and threatened her that he will upload the photos in the social media and asked the defacto complainant to have physical relationship with him. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that co-accused/A1 had already been granted bail by this Court in Crl.OP(MD).No.9880 of 2025 dated 17.06.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/5

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the investigation is almost completed and co-accused had already been granted bail by this Court and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the investigation has been almost completed and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and co-accused had already been granted bail by this Court. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Trichy, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Trichy, and on further conditions that: (a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain 3/5

a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b) the petitioner shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Trichy, In the event of any change in his residential address, the petitioner shall report the same to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Trichy.

(c) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

(d) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

4/5

(g) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023.

Sd/- 04/07/25 // True Copy // /2025 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

msrm To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Trichy 2.Do through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Trichy District.

3.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thiruverumbur,Tirchy District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11249 of 2025 Date : 04.07.2025 AVK/23.07.2025 5P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5