Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15713/2020allowed

Pandiyarajan v. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police

2020-12-23Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.15713 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15713 of 2020 Pandiyarajan ... Petitioner/Sole Accused vs.

1)The State Rep by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Peraiyur Police Station (Circle) Madurai District.

: 1st Respondent/Investigating Officer 2)The State Rep by The Sub Inspector of Police, Sedapatty Police Station, Madurai District.

(In Crime No.2145 of 2020) : 2nd Respondent/Complainant 3)Ramakrishnan : 3rd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for records of the case in Crime No.2145 of 2020 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same as against the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jegadeesh Pandian For R1 & R2 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor For R3 : Mr.B.Viswanathan

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for records relating to the FIR in Crime No.2145/2020 on the file of 2nd respondent police and quash the same.

2.The 3rd respondent/defacto complainant, as well as the petitioner/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the 3rd respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioner would pray for quashing the FIR. 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today and the defacto complainant has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.15713 of 2020 represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the FIR in Crime No.2145/2020 on the file of 2nd respondent police, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) bala Enclose: Xerox Copy of Joint Compromise Memo. Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned. To 1)The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Peraiyur Police Station (Circle) Madurai District.

2)The Sub Inspector of Police, Sedapatty Police Station, Madurai District.

3)The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ORDER MADE IN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15713 of 2020 DATED : 23.12.2020 MJ(CO) CS(08.01.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2