Tvl. Kings Builders, v. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 2,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.06.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD)No.12306 of 2026 Tvl. Kings Builders, Represented by its Proprietor N.Sathya Moorthi, GSTIN 33EEAPS0099F1ZJ, 14/673-5, Main Road, Pavoorchatram.

.. Petitioner - Vs. - The Deputy State Tax Officer-2, Tenkasi Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Buildings, Tenkasi.

.. Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the respondent in GSTIN : 33EEAPS0099F1ZJ/2021-22 dated 29.12.2025 for the assessment year 2021-2022 passed by the respondent under Section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017 and to quash the same as cryptic, non-speaking, illegal, arbitrary, wholly without jurisdiction and direct the respondent to pass assessment order afresh after affording opportunity of being heard. 1/6

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudalai Muthu For Respondent : Mr.S.Vashik Ali Government Standing Counsel

ORDER

This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 29.12.2025 which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Standing Counsel for the respondent.

3. By the impugned order, the assessment was made ex-parte because the petitioner did not utilise the opportunities provided. The discrepancies and grounds on which the assessment order was issued, the dealer's explanation on merits, and the reasons for not participating in the assessment proceedings are summarised briefly and presented in a table below:

2/6

Discrepancies found/Grounds on which the Order is Explanation offered by Explanation for not availing the opportunity the Assessee on merits passed

1. Exemption claimed on pure labour contract services was disallowed by the department.

1.The petitioner executed only pure labour contracts for construction of individual residential houses.

1.All notices, hearing intimations and communications were uploaded only on the GST portal.

2. Entire exempt turnover was treated as taxable construction service under Heading 9954.

2.Customers supplied the land, materials, plans and specifications and the petitioner supplied only labour services.

2.The petitioner is a small contractor with limited knowledge of GST law and online compliances.

3.GST compliance work was entrusted to a part time accountant.

3.Tax demand of Rs.

16,64,200/- (CGST Rs.8,32,100/- and SGST Rs.8,32,100/-) along with interest and penalty was levied.

3.The services squarely fall under Serial No.11 of Notification No.12/2017Central Tax (Rate), exempting pure labour contracts relating to single residential units.

4.The accountant failed to inform the petitioner about the notices and assessment proceedings.

4.The respondent presumed the services were taxable construction services and denied exemption claimed under Notification No.

12/2017.

4.No finding was recorded that the petitioner supplied materials, executed a works contract, or constructed residential complexes.

5.Consequently, the petitioner remained unaware of the proceedings and could neither file objections nor produce supporting records before the assessment order was passed.

4. Considering the nature of the discrepancies noted, the explanation provided by the assessee and the reason given before this Court for not availing the opportunity, I believe that an opportunity can be granted to the 3/6

assessee to present their submissions and produce the relevant supporting documents before the respondent assessing officer. This Court has been extending such opportunities on equitable grounds; however, under appropriate conditions. Therefore, an opportunity is granted to the petitioner assessee.

5. Since it is stated that the petitioner is dealing with the labor contract, which is claimed to be exempt from tax, no additional condition is imposed. In view thereof, this Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms:

(i) The impugned order dated 29.12.2025 shall stand set aside, and the matter shall stand remanded back to the file of the respondent;

(ii) Within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a web copy of this order, the assessee shall appear before the respondent without fail and submit their reply and documents in support of their claim, and it is for the respondent to consider the matter afresh and pass orders in accordance with law; 4/6

(iii) Since the impugned order of assessment is set aside, any attachment of the bank account made pursuant to the impugned order shall stand raised;

(iv) No costs. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

17.06.2026 sji NCC: Yes/No To The Deputy State Tax Officer-2, Tenkasi Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Buildings, Tenkasi.

5/6

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

sji 17.06.2026 6/6