Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/1530/2019disposed of

Bank Of Baroda v. M/S.Sri Venkatram Spinners Private Ltd.,

2019-09-03Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy2 pages

CRP(MD)No.1530 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.09.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY CRP(MD)No.1530 of 2019 Bank of Baroda Rep. by its Authorized Officer, Rajapalayam Branch, 855-861, Tenkasi Road, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

... Petitioner/1st Respondnet versus

1. M/s.Sri Venkatram Spinners Private Limited, Rep. through one of its Director, S.Srinivasan, Door No.109/2, Koonamkulam Road, Rajapalayam (via), Cholapuram - 626 139, Virudhunagar District.

2. S.Srinivasan ... Respondents/Appellants Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, to dispose the S.A.No.501 of 2017 pending on its file, within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner :

Mr.D.Sadiq Raja

ORDER

The revision petitioner herein is the respondent in S.A.No.501 of 2017 pending on the file of Debt Recovery Tribunal, Madurai.

2. The respondents herein filed S.A.No.501 of 2017 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, challenging the sale notice dated 23.11.2017 issued by the Bank, who is the revision petitioner herein.

3. Since the said appeal in S.A.No.501 of 2017 is pending from the year 2017, the revision petitioner is before this Court.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that challenging the sale notice dated 23.11.2017 issued by the revision petitioner Bank, the appeal in S.A.No.501 of 2017 has been filed by the respondents herein before the Debt Recovery https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRP(MD)No.1530 of 2019 Tribunal, Madurai, in the year 2017 itself. Though the said appeal was adjourned for several times, for arguments on the side of respondents herein, the respondents have not turned up for submitting their arguments. So, the trial Court permitted the revision petitioner to submit their arguments. The revision petitioner also completed their arguments. However, the respondents, in order to drag on the proceedings, have not come forward to submit their arguments till date. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, to dispose of S.A.No.501 of 2017.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, this Court directs the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, to dispose of S.A.No.501 of 2017, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To The Debt Recovery Tribunal, Madurai.

+2 CC to Mr.PALA RAMASAMY, Advocate SR-84962 & 85408. CRP(MD)No.1530 of 2019 03.09.2019 CS(24.09.2019) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2