← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18978/2019dismissed as infructuous

Karthik Kumar v. The Sup. Of Police

2022-03-11Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.18978 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.03.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P.(MD)No.18978 of 2019 and W.M.P(MD) No.15288 of 2019 Karthik Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai Division, Sivagangai District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Kalayarkovil Police Station, Sivagangai District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.467/Ka.Thu.Ka.Siva.U.Ko/2019, dated 19.08.2019 and quash the same so far as the rejection of permission in installing the inscription of Alagumuthu Kone and consequently directing the respondents to grant permission to the petitioner to install an inscription of Alagumuthu Kone in the house site belonged to the Alagumuthu Kone Elangair Narpani Mandram in Survey No.267/1, Mangalam Village, Kalayarkovil Taluk, Sivagangai District.

For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayer sought for in the petition has become infructous.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.18978 of 2019

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RECORDS) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Ebsi Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai Division, Sivagangai District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Kalayarkovil Police Station, Sivagangai District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.NIRANJAN S KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-11639[F] dated 11/03/2022 ) W.P.(MD)No.18978 of 2019 and W.M.P(MD) No.15288 of 2019 11.03.2022 USK/31.03.2022/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2