← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/17142/2023disposed of

Krishnan.U v. The District Collector

2023-07-17Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI U.Krishnan ... Petitioner versus

1. The District Collector, O/o. Collector office, Madurai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Madurai.

3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office - North Madurai District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.03.2023 and consequentially direct the 3rd respondent for issuance of patta to the property situated in Survey No.40/3A1, Plot No.6, with an extent of 2400 sq. ft. Ramankulam Village, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai. 1/5

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Ms.D.Farjana Ghoushia, Special Government Pleader

ORDER

The petitioner has submitted a representation dated 22.03.2023 before the third respondent, seeking issuance of patta for the land in Survey No.40/3A1 situated at Ramankulam Village, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

2. Ms.D.Farjana Ghoushia, learned Special Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has submitted a similar representation before the 3rd respondent on 26.09.2020 for grant of patta for the land in Survey No.40/3A1, which was rejected by the third respondent, by order dated 24.12.2020, on the ground that it has been undefined. As against the order dated 24.12.2020, the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the second respondent/the Revenue 2/5

Divisional Officer, Madurai.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner claims that the order dated 24.12.2020 had not been furnished to the petitioner and therefore, he was not aware of the same.

4. Considering that the earlier representation of the petitioner was rejected by the third respondent by order dated 24.12.2020 and the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the second respondent/the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, this writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal under Patta Pass Book Act before the second respondent/the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

17.07.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

3/5

To

1. The District Collector, O/o. Collector office, Madurai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Madurai.

3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office - North Madurai District.

4/5

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 17.07.2023 5/5