Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15242/2021disposed of

Chelladurai v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-10-06Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15242 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.10.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15242 of 2021 1.Chelladurai 2.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Ramanathapuram District.

4.Ramamoorthy ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent 1 to instruct the respondents2 & 3 herein not to interfere in the civil dispute in respect of property comprised in Survey No.54/11 and 54/13 admeasures to an extent of 1 acres and 52 cents situated at Keelamudukulathur Village, Mudukulathur Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, under the guise of enquiry in pursuance to the complaint lodged by the fourth respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For R1 to R3 : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking a direction to respondent police not to harass the petitioner on the basis of the complaint given by the fourth respondent.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that there is civil dispute between the petitioner and the fourth respondent and in respect of which, the fourth respondent has given a complaint.

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that no such complaint has been received or no enquiry is pending https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15242 of 2021 against this petitioner.

4.But, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was called upon by the third respondent over phone without making any proper official complaint.

5. It may not be proper on the part of the third respondent to make call to the petitioner without any complaint against him. If any complaint is received in future against the petitioner, the third respondent may take action as per law, but except that no enquiry shall be made.

6.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (W) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vrn Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15242 of 2021 06.10.2021 RD/JGB (02.11.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2