Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12035/2019disposed of

D. Alicia Rodrigo v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-08-28Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12035 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.08.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL.O.P.(MD).No.12035 of 2019 D.Alicia Rodrigo : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thaluk Police Station, Thiruchendur, Thoothukudi District.

3.Alponse Sahaya Merry : Respondents PRAYER : Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of petition enquiry.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.M.Manivelpandian For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to direct the second respondent not harass the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the official respondents. Considering the nature of the order going to be passed in this petition, notice to the third respondent herein is dispensed with.

3. According to the petitioner, there is a money dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent. Earlier the third respondent gave a complaint before the second respondent. Based on that, enquiry has been conducted and after enquiry, the said complaint has been closed. Once again, the third respondent gave another complaint to the second respondent. Now under the guise of conducing enquiry on the same, the second respondent is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12035 of 2019 harassing the petitioner. Hence, the present petition has been filed.

4. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the official respondents, on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by the third respondent, enquiry has been conducted and since the complainant did not appear for enquiry, the second respondent has closed the complaint.

5. Considering the fact that already complaint given by the third respondent has been enquired and closed, the second respondent police is directed not to harass the petitioner.

6. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ta To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thaluk Police Station, Thiruchendur, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.M.M. MANI VEL PANDIAN, Advocate ( SR-83860[F] dated 28/08/2019 ) Order made in CRL.O.P.(MD).No.12035 of 2019 Dated:

28.08.2019 KM/(16.09.2019) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2