Muthukumar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Criminal Original Jurisdiction Thursday, the Tenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP 1.Muthukumar
2. Vetrivel,
3. Sivasankar @ Siva ... Petitioners/Accused No.27,30 & 40 Vs 1 The Inspector of Police Koodankulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.(Crime No.354/2012) ..1st Respondent/Complainant 2 Sandal Muthuraj ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer :- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the case in P.R.C.No.128 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District and quash the same in respect of the Petitioners.
ORDER:- This Criminal Original Petition, on this day coming on for reporting compliance of the order dated 14.10.2022 and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon perusing the order dated 14.10.2022 and hearing the arguments of Mr. A. Kesavan, Advocate for the Petitioners and of Mr. Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor, for the 1st respondent, this Court made the following order:
"The criminal original petition filed by the petitioners was allowed on condition that they should deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) to the account of the Panchayat through the Office of 1/3
the learned Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District and the case was posted for reporting compliance, on 10.11.2022. 2.Accordingly, the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram, had reported the compliance through the learned Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli and the same is recorded.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that in the order, dated 14.10.2022, made in this petition, it is stated that Mr.N.Thinakaran, Advocate appeared for the second respondent herein. On such date, no Counsel appeared for the second respondent. Mr.N.Thinakaran, only appeared in the connected matter in Crl.O.P(MD)No.14945 of 2022.
4.On verification, it is found that no vakalat had been filed for the second respondent. Therefore, Registry is directed to remove the appearance for the second respondent and issue a fresh order copy."
Sd/- Assistant Registrar () // True Copy // /11/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TO
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District
2. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Radhapuram.
3. The Inspector of Police Koodankulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Copy to:
1.The Section Officer, Criminal Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai 2/3
2. The Court Manager, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai ORDER DATED : 10/11/2022 ==========================
ORDER
========================== Giving direction and etc.
as stated within.
AMS(17.11.2022) 3P 7C 3/3