S.Kolappa Perumal v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.07.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Kolappa Perumal ... Petitioner versus

1. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3to consider the petitioner's representation / complaint dated 30.01.2023 and 04.10.2024 and conduct the fair investigation and proceed in accordance with law within a time stipulated by this Court. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugan For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this petition with a grievance that the respondent police have not taken action on his complaint. 2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submits that the petitioner's complaint has been enquired and closed as civil in nature.

3.Recording the above submission this petition is closed with a direction to the respondent police to furnish a copy of the closure report to the petitioner enabling him to workout his remedy in the manner known to law.

10.07.2025 DSK Internet : Yes 2/4

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

DSK 10.07.2025 4/4