Sivanandam v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thanjavur Taluk
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17.11.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Sivanandam ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By The Inspector of Police, Thanjavur Taluk Police Station, Thanjavur District.
...Respondent
(Crime No.253 of 2025) For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.253 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.
1/6
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 194 BNSS @ 108 BNS in Crime No.253 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to money dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant's husband, the petitioner abused the husband of the defacto complainant and attacked him. Due to which, the husband of the defacto complainant committed suicide and later, he died on 27.04.2025. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he is no way connected with the alleged occurrence as stated by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seek anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/6
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent-Police opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. The interim order already granted by this Court is made absolute.
6. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions regularly, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavur, failing 3/6
which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
(a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; (c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560] and;
(f) if the accused/petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh 4/6
FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023. (S S Y J) 17.11.2025 KSA To
1. The Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Thanjavur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thanjavur Taluk Police Station, Thanjavur District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
S.SRIMATHY, J.
5/6
KSA
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.11273 of 2025 Date : 17.11.2025 6/6