Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18878/2020disposed of

Renganadhan v. The District Collector

2020-12-21Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.12.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.(MD).No.15813 of 2020 Renganadhan .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.

2. The Sub-Collector, Sub-Collector Office, Kulithalai, Karur District.

3. The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Collectorate Campus, Karur, Karur District.

4. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kulithalai, Karur District.

5. The Commissioner / BDO, Panchayat Union, Kulithalai, Karur District.

6. The President, Inungur Panchayat, Inungur, Karur District.

7. The Secretary, Inungur Panchayat, Inungur, Karur District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to lay road in the petitioner's patta land bearing Survey Nos.238/2A, 339/8B, 339/10, 339/11 and 339/12, situated at Inungur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District and its Patta No.1187 & 309.

1/3

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For Respondents : Mr.A.Karthik for R1 to R4 Government Advocate Mrs.M.Rajeswari for R5 to R7 Government Advocate

ORDER

(This writ petition is heard through video conference) This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents not to lay a road in the petitioner's patta land bearing Survey Nos.238/2A, 339/8B, 339/10, 339/11 and 339/12, situated in Inungur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District and its Patta No.1187 & 309.

2.Heard Mr.R.Murugappan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.A.Karthik, learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4 and Mrs.M.Rajeswari, learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 5 to 7.

3.By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 4.Mrs.M.Rajeswari, learned Government Advocate, on instructions, would submit that the subject lands are admittedly patta lands belonging to the petitioner. She would also submit on instructions that the respondents have dropped the proposal of laying the road in the petitioner's property. 5.The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions is satisfied with the submission made by the respondents 5 to 7 before this Court that they have dropped the proposal of laying the road in the petitioner's property, which is the subject matter of this writ petition.

6.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 5 to 7, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (A.E) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM 2/3

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To