P.Arumugam, S/O.Paramasiivam, v. The Management Of Tamilnadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.04.2016 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Writ Petition (MD) No.6825 of 2016 P.Arumugam ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Karaikudi Region, Rep by its General Manager, Karaikudi.
2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai 2.
... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus,directing the 1st respondent to pay the petitioner Rs.2,11,032/- towards Leave Salary and also arrears of wages for the period from 01.09.13 to 30.11.13 payable pursuant new wage settlement together with 18% interest per annum and further directing the respondents to pay him Rs.2,92,516/- towards the Pension Commutation amount and arrears of pension for the period from 01.12.13 by revising his pension together with 18% interest per annum after calculating all his terminal / pension benefits based on the monthly wages payable to him on the month of his retirement i.e.November, 2013 by revising the same as per the settlement dated 13.04.2015 as ordered by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in its order dated 29.01.2016 in W.A(MD)No.1457 of 2015 etc., batch. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For Respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman Standing Counsel
ORDER
The prayer in the writ petition is for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to pay retirement benefits with interest to the petitioner.
2.It is stated that though the petitioner was allowed to retire from the service of the respondents, till date the respondent Corporation has not settled the retirement benefits.
Hence, the petitioner has given representations to settle the entire terminal benefits along with interest for the belated payment. As there was no response to the said representations, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition. 3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.D.Sivaraman, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment, passed by the Honourable Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 4.For ready reference, the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015 is extracted as follows:
"The learned Additional Advocate General submits that he has obtained written instructions vide letter No.7945/E/2015-2 dated 11.06.2015 that the terminal benefits of the appellants would be settled through twelve equal monthly instalments, carrying interest of 6% p.a.
2.The said statement is thus taken on record and the respondents will be bound by the same, we have to keep in mind the judicial pronouncement of the Honourable Supreme Court in D.D.TEWARI (D) THR. LRS. Vs. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD & ORS {2014
(9) SCALE - 78}, wherein it is held that in case of any delay in making the payment of the installments, the interest payable would become 18% p.a., for the delayed period apart from any other remedy which may be available to the appellants for non-compliance of undertaking given to this Court.
3.The installments to be paid from July 2015 and each installment should be paid on or before 7th of each month"
5.Following the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court referred to above, the respondents are directed to pay the amount due to the petitioner in 12 equal installments commencing from 10th May 2016. It is needless to mention that the entire arrears shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum. In case of delay in making installments, the interest payable could be 18% for the delayed period.
6.The aforesaid direction to settle the terminal benefits would not preclude the workman to question the computation of any of the terminal benefits, if the same is paid lesser than the amount to which, he is entitled to receive. Likewise, if the petitioner has any grievance that he is entitled to interest for
the amount already settled, he can agitate the same as per law, if he is entitled to.
7.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The General Manager Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Karaikudi Region, Karaikudi.
2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai 2.
+1cc to Mr.D.Sivaraman,Advocate Sr.No.19811 +1cc to Mr.S.Arunachalam,Advocate Sr.No.20307 sms AA/GSV-PM/25.04.2016/3p-5c Writ Petition (MD) No.6825 of 2016 07.04.2016