Naveen v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.09.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP CRL.O.P (MD) No.15639 of 2022 1.Naveen 2.Vikki @ Vigneshwaran

...Petitioners

vs

1. The Inspector of Police Musiri Police Station Trichy City.

2.Periyasamy

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No. 259 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Arun raj For R1 : Mr.S.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.M.Silambarasan 1/5

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No. 259 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent police.

2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that Petitioner and the second Respondent are neighbours. The offences alleged in the First Information Report are 294(b),324,427 and 506(ii) of IPC. After registration of the First Information Report, the matter was amicably settled between the parties, therefore the petitioners seeks quash the First Information Report.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor vehemently objected to the line of the arguments of the learned counsel for the Petitioners stating that the date of occurrence is 31.07.2022 and the First Information Report came to be registered on 02.08.2022. He further submitted that the petitioners herein trespassed into house of the defacto complainant and damaged the door of the defacto complainant worth about Rs.5000/- 2/5

4. This Court had raised query with the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, whether the Petitioners are ready to pay a sum of Rs.50000/- towards compromise to the defacto complainant, for which he is unable to give reply. The learned Counsel for the second Respondent/Defacto Complainant would submit that the Petitioners are the grand sons of the defacto complainant.

5. Since the learned counsel for the Petitioner is unable to give reply to the query raised by this Court, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings in Crime No. 259 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent police.

6. In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 05.09.2022 Internet:Yes./No Index:Yes/no aav 3/5

To

1. The Inspector of Police Musiri Police Station Trichy City.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP , J.

aav CRL.O.P (MD) No.15639 of 2022 05.09.2022 5/5