Muthumari, v. Manoj Prabakaran

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.11.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and C.M.P(MD).No.7690 of 2022 Muthumari ... Petitioner versus Manoj Prabakaran ... Respondent Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 C.P.C. to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.695 of 2022 on the file of the Family Court at Madurai and transfer the same to the file of the Sub Court, Srivilliputtur.

For Petitioner : Mr.Lakshmi Gopinathan For Respondent : No appearance 1/6

ORDER

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking transfer of H.M.O.P.No.695 of 2022 from the file of the Family Court, Madurai, to the file of the Sub Court, Srivilliputtur.

2. The petitioner herein is the wife and the respondent herein is the husband. The marriage between them was solemnized on 13.03.2019, as per Hindu Rites and Customs and out of the wedlock, they are blessed with a child. Due to some misunderstanding, now, they are living separately. Thereafter, the respondent has filed H.M.O.P.No.695 of 2022 before the Family Court, Madurai, seeking divorce. Now, the petitioner and her 2-year-old baby are living along with her aged parents at Rajapalayam. Since she alone has to take care of her child and there is no one to accompany her, she finds it difficult to travel from Rajapalayam to Madurai. Hence, she filed the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition to transfer the case in H.M.O.P.No.695 of 2022 from the file of the Family Court, Madurai, 2/6

to the file of the Sub Court, Srivilliputtur.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the distance between Rajapalayam and Madurai is around 91kms. Now, the petitioner and her 2-year-old baby are living along with her aged parents at Rajapalayam. Further, the petitioner is not having sufficient means to travel and she depends upon her parents to meet out her dayto-day expenses. Since there is no one to accompany her, she finds it difficult to travel from Rajapalayam to Madurai, for appearing before the Family Court, Madurai, for each and every hearing.

4. Though notice was served on the respondent and his name has been printed in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of him either in person or through a counsel.

5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Amitha Shah vsVirendar Lal Shah, reported (2003)10 SCC 609) has held that the 3/6

convenience of the wife and more so of the child must be taken into account while deciding the petition for transfer and in the case of Rajani Kishor Paradeshi Vs Kishor Babulal Paradeshi reported in (2005) 12 SCC 237, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that in such type of transfer petitions, the convenience of the wife is to be preferred over the convenience of the husband.

6. This Court, by taking into consideration that the convenience of wife is to be taken into consideration at the time of considering transfer petitions as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments cited supra, is inclined to allow the present petition.

7. Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous petition stands allowed. The proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.695 of 2022 pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai, is withdrawn and ordered to be transferred to the file of the Sub Court, Srivilliputtur. The Family Court, Madurai, is directed to transmit the entire case records to the 4/6

Sub Court, Srivilliputtur, forthwith. The learned Sub Judge, Srivilliputtur, shall dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04.11.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ogy To

1. The Family Court, Madurai.

2. The Sub Court, Srivilliputtur.

5/6

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 04.11.2022 6/6