← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11635/2026granted

Rani v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Panagudi

2026-06-19Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Rani ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

Cr.No. 818/2026..

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P.Praveenkumar, For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 818 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. 1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.06.2026 for the offences punishable under Section 123 of BNS r/w Section 24(1) 6(b) of the Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 in Crime No. 272 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 10.06.2026, on receipt of secret information, the respondent police were doing their patrol duty near Jonathan Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Kamaraj Nagar, they found that the accused persons were found in possession of banned tobacco products worth about Rs.46,950/-. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and she was falsely implicated in this case and she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the alleged contraband was recovered by the prosecution and she has been arrested and remanded to 2/6

judicial custody on 03.06.2026. Hence, prays for bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the accused was found in possession of banned tobacco products. The petitioner has 6 previous cases at her credit. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature and hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the nature of the offence and the fact that the alleged contraband was recovered by the prosecution and further considering the fact that though the petitioner has previous cases to her credit, she has already been granted bail in those cases, as well as the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: 3/6

[a] Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

4/6

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 19.06.2026 PNM TO

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor

2. The Superintendent, Central Prison for Women, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli

3. The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL,J PNM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11635 of 2026 Date : 19/06/2026 6/6