S.P.S. Murugesan, v. A.T.Chinnadurai

and CMP (MD) No.14866 of 2023 C. SARAVANAN, J.

It is informed by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that this case was listed today under the caption "For Being Mentioned". 2.

The learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that, instead of recording his appearance, it has been mentioned as 'No representation for the Petitioners' in the first paragraph of the Order dated 12.12.2025 in Review Application (MD).No.84 of 2023, and therefore prayed to include his name. 3.

Considering the above submission, as the decision of this Court is not going to be altered and no harm would be caused by including the name of the counsel for the Petitioners, the Registry is directed to incorporate the name of the learned counsel who appeared for the Petitioners in the Order dated 12.12.2025 in Review Application (MD).No.84 of 2023, wherever necessary, and issue a fresh order copy to the parties concerned. 10.04.2026 klt

C.SARAVANAN, J.

klt and CMP (MD) No.14866 of 2023 10.04.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Review Application (MD)No.84 of 2023 in C.R.P.(MD).No.1012 of 2023

1. S.P.S.Murugesan

2. Pushpavalli

3. S.P.S.Palanivel ... Petitioners Vs.

1. A.T.Chinnadurai

2. C.M.Murugesan

3. A.T.C.Subramani

4. C.Radhakrishnan

5. C.Manikandan

6. The District Collector, District Collector Office, Dindigul.

7. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kodaikanal Dindigul District ... Respondents For R1 to R5 : Mr.S.Rajasekar

ORDER

No representation for the Petitioners and the Respondents 6 and 7.

2. There is no merit in this application for review of the order passed by this Court rejecting C.R.P.(MD).No.1012 of 2023 filed by the petitioners, who appear to be the brothers and sister of the Late.Ganesan, who died along with his wife and minor child.

3. The challenge to the impleading of the private respondents herein, based on a reading of Section 15(1)(b) of the Hindu Succession Act, is the subject matter of suit which can be decided by the Trial Court at the behest of the petitioners as plaintiff in O.S.No.8 of 2021.

4. All the differences that are available in law can be canvassed by the petitioners before the Trial Court.

5. In view thereof, this review application is liable to be dismissed, and accordingly, it is dismissed.

12.12.2025 raja To

1. The District Collector, District Collector Office, Dindigul.

2. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

C.SARAVANAN, J.

raja Review Application (MD)No.84 of 2023 in C.R.P.(MD).No.1012 of 2023

12.12.2025