← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/7315/2016disposed of

P.Natarajan, Staff No. J0572 v. The Managing Director

2016-04-15Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.04.2016 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Writ Petition (MD) No.7315 of 2016 P.Natarajan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, Coimbatore Limited, 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore-641 043.

2. The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, Coimbatore Limited, Erode Region, Sennimalai Salai, Erode District.

3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai -2.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the retirement benefits with interest to the petitioner in view of the representation dated 6.4.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Royce Immanuel For respondents : Mr.K.Sathiyasingh

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to pay retirement benefits along with interest to the petitioner.

2.It is stated that though the petitioner was allowed to retire from the service of the respondents, till date the respondents / Corporation did not settle the retirement benefits. Hence, the petitioner has given representations to settle the entire terminal benefits along with interest for the belated

payment. As there was no response to the same, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition.

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.K.Sathiyasingh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench.

4.For ready reference, the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015 is extracted hereunder:

"The learned Additional Advocate General submits that he has obtained written instructions vide letter No.7945/E/2015-2 dated 11.06.2015 that the terminal benefits of the appellants would be settled through twelve equal monthly installments, carrying interest of 6% p.a.

2.The said statement is thus taken on record and the respondents will be bound by the same, we have to keep in mind the judicial pronouncement of the Honourable Supreme Court in D.D.TEWARI (D) THR. LRS. Vs. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD & ORS {2014

(9) SCALE - 78}, wherein it is held that in case of any delay in making the payment of the installments, the interest payable would become 18% p.a., for the delayed period apart from any other remedy which may be available to the appellants for non-compliance of undertaking given to this Court.

3.The installments to be paid from July 2015 and each installment should be paid on or before 7th of each month"

5.Following the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court referred to above, the respondents are directed to pay the amount due to the petitioner in 12 equal monthly installments commencing from 10th May, 2016. Further, if there are settlements or awards, the Corporation is obliged to take the same into account while arriving at the figure. It is needless to mention that the entire arrears shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum. In case of delay in making installments, the interest payable could be 18% for the delayed period.

6.The aforesaid direction to settle the terminal benefits would not preclude the workman to question the computation of any of the terminal benefits, if the same is paid lesser than the amount to which, he is entitled to receive. Likewise, if the petitioner has any grievance that he is entitled to interest for

the amount already settled, he can agitate the same as per law, if he is entitled to.

7.The learned counsel for the respondents/Transport Corporation says that against certain employees, there are recoverables from them. So, the above payment may be made subject to recoverables from the employees. The petitioner is also agreeable for the same.

8.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Writs) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, Coimbatore Limited, 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore-641 043.

2. The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, Coimbatore Limited, Erode Region, Sennimalai Salai, Erode District.

3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai -2.

+1cc to M/s.S.Royce Emmanual Advocate SR.No.21115 +1cc to M/s.K.Sathiya Singh, Advocate Sr.No.21084 sm:GSV-MP:10.5.2016:3P/6C Writ Petition (MD) No.7315 of 2016