Rasu v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.08.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Rasu

...Petitioner

vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, Oddanchathiram Police Station, Dindigul District.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to take action on the petitioner's complaint dated 04.07.2022 and investigate the same by following due procedure. For Petitioner :Mr.J.Lawrance For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to the 2nd respondent to take action on the petitioner's complaint, dated 04.07.2022 and investigate the same.

1/4

2. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondents submitted that based on a complaint given by the petitioner, dated 04.07.2022 is pending for enquiry in C.S.R.No.583 of 2022 on the file of the 2nd respondent police. The statement is recorded.

3. Recording the same, the 2nd respondent/Inspector of Police is directed to consider the complaint of the petitioner, dated 04.07.2022, on merits and in accordance with law and pass suitable orders, within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

4. With the above observation, this Writ petition is disposed of. No Cost.

24.08.2022 Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No ksa 2/4

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, Oddanchathiram Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

V.SIVAGNANAM, J ksa W.P(MD)No.19455 of 2022 24.08.2022 4/4