Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18895/2019dismissed as infructuous

U.Ramasamy Ambalam v. The Superintendent Of Police

2022-02-25Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.18895 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.02.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P.(MD)No.18895 of 2019 U.Ramasamy Ambalam ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Annavasal Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

3. Mr.Subramanian S/o. Muthaiah Thevar, Special Sub Inspector of Police, Karayoor Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take necessary action against the third respondent herein in accordance with law and on the basis of petitioner representation dated 14.08.2019 within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Malaiyendran For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking direction to direct the first respondent to take necessary action against the third respondent herein, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 14.08.2019.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, enquiry has been conducted in CSR No.263 of 2019. During the course of enquiry, the parties have appeared before the Enquiry Officer and the third respondent has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.18895 of 2019 given a statment that they will settle the issue between them in village level panchayat. On the basis of the statement given by them, the complaint given by the petitioner has been closed.

3. Since the complaint given by the petitioner has been closed, nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this petition and the petition has become infructuous.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-I) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ebsi Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Annavasal Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. W.P.(MD)No.18895 of 2019 25.02.2022 SAR(CO) KB(21.03.2022) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2