Periyasamy v. The Inspector General Of Registration Department

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.08.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Periyasamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration Department, 100, Santhome Highroad, Chennai-600 028.

2.The District Registrar, Palani Registration District, Palani.

3.The Sub Registrar, Vedasandur, Dindigul.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to pass an appropriate order considering the petitioner's representation dated 16.07.2024 in accordance with law within the time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Azhagesh For Respondents : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner's request cannot be accepted for the present. An exparte decree had been registered by the third respondent. The petitioner has filed an IA for setting aside the same. He is yet to get the decree set aside. Therefore, the question of entertaining the request at this stage does not arise. If IA is allowed, the petitioner can renew his request.

2. With this liberty to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

02.08.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To 1.The Inspector General of Registration Department, 100, Santhome Highroad, Chennai-600 028.

2.The District Registrar, Palani Registration District, Palani.

2/4

3.The Sub Registrar, Vedasandur, Dindigul.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

rmi 02.08.2024 4/4