Thirumurugan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/08/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM
1. Thirumurugan
2. Ilayaraja ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2 Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Irukkangudi Police Station, Virudhunagar District (Crime No.92/2019). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.A.Karthik, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.92 of 2019 on the file of the respondent.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC r/w 21 (1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No. 92 of 2019, seek anticipatory bail.
2. Heard both sides.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that as per the FIR, the petitioners only attempted to take sand. He further submitted that the petitioners are not having any bad antecedents and hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 1/3
4.Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has submitted that the petitioners have attempted to take sand without any valid permission. However, he fairly conceded that no similar type of case is pending against the petitioners.
5.Taking into consideration of the fact that the petitioners have only attempted to take sand and also the fact that no previous case is pending against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) If the petitioners fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.
(ii) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required before the respondent police for interrogation. (iii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
(iv) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. (vi) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC sd/- 30/08/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
2/3
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, SATUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE IRUKKANGUDI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.A.KARTHIK Advocate SR.No.14565
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.12191 of 2019 Date :30/08/2019 LS PK/PN/SAR-2/10.09.2019 : 3P/6C 3/3