Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12217/2019disposed of

Ramachandran v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-09-06Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12217 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.09.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12217 of 2019 G. Ramachandran .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District,Madurai.

3.Subbulakshmi 4.G.Thirupathi ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to harass the petitioner and his family members, in the guise of enquiry by intefering with the subject matter of the pending civil suit, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 20.08.2019.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Vadivelan For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 not to harass the petitioner and his family members, in the guise of enquiry by interfering with the subject matter of the pending civil suit, on the basis of the petitioner's representation, dated 20.08.2019.

2. It is seen that there is a dispute between the family members with regard to properties. In this regard, they have also filed a suit in O.S.No. 16 of 2019, in which, the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are the parties. On the complaint lodged by the respondent Nos. 3 and 4, the 2nd respondent calling the petitioner and also harassing them to settle the issue.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12217 of 2019

3. Admittedly, the civil suit is pending between the parties and as such the second respondent has no role to play in this case.

4. I have heard Mr. T. Vadivelan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent 1 and 2.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court directs the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant.

6. With the above observations and direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District,Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.T.VADIVELAN, Advocate ( SR-85793[F] dated 06/09/2019 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12217 of 2019 06.09.2019 TRP MS/03.10.2019/2P.5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2