Krishnan .M v. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.08.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM M.Krishnan

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvadanai, 2.The Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station,

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to give permission to conduct Lakshman Sruthi Orchestra on 27.08.2022, Aadal Padal on 28.08.2022 and Sri Valli Thirumana Nadagam on 29.08.2022 in view of Kudamuluku (Kumbhabhishekam) to Arulmighu Valli Dheivanai Sametha Sri Balasubramaniyar Thirukovil, Nambuthalai, Ramanathapuram District.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthikumar Government Advocate (crl.side) 1/5

O R D E R

The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to give permission to conduct Lakshman Sruthi Orchestra on 27.08.2022, Aadal Padal on 28.08.2022 and Sri Valli Thirumana Nadagam on 29.08.2022 in connection with Kudamuluku (Kumbhabhishekam) to Arulmighu Valli Dheivanai Sametha Sri Balasubramaniyar Thirukovil, Nambuthalai, 2.Mr.M.Sakthikumar, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that temple festival, by name, Arulmighu Valli Dheivanai Sametha Sri Balasubramaniyar Thirukovil, Nambuthalai, Ramanathapuram District is going to be held from 27.08.2022 to 29.08.2022. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 17.08.2022. But the respondent police has not considered the said representation. Since no order was 2/5

passed, the petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.

4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the respondent police has received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.

5.I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.

6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019 dated 09.04.2019 along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.08.2022 and pass 3/5

suitable orders based on the above said circular.

7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

23.08.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No vsd To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvadanai, 2.The Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station, 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

V.SIVAGNANAM., J vsd 23.08.2022 5/5