Ganesan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.01.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy Revenue Division, Trichy.
2.The Assistant Director of Mines and Minerals, Trichy District, Trichy.
3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office of Thiruverumbur, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District.
... Respondents Prayer:
Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the petitioner's Tata Ace Mini Door Auto bearing registration No.TN 55 Q 0058, seized on 04.03.2019 and keeping under the custody of the third respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 15.12.2020. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.M.Rajarajan, Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2.The petitioner claims to be the owner of the petition mentioned vehicle. It was seized in connection with illegal transportation of sand by the revenue authorities. The petitioner's counsel states that till date no FIR has been registered and the vehicle in question has not been produced before the jurisdictional court.
3.It has been held time and again that keeping the vehicle in the custody of the respondents is not going to serve any purpose. On the other hand, it will contribute to loss of value. Since the vehicle has not been produced before the trial court, 1/4
the Writ Court will always have the power to direct release of vehicle.
4.The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the vehicle has not been involved in any previous case of the same nature. He also submitted that the petitioner is also not having any previous case. The petitioner undertakes to remit a sum of Rs.5,000/- as non refundable cost.
5.The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2002) 10 SCC 283 (Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai and Others V. State of Gujarat) has held as follows:- "17.In our view, whatever be the situation, it is of no use to keep such seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period. It is for the Magistrate to pass appropriate orders immediately by taking appropriate bond and guarantee as well as security for return of the said vehicles, if required at any point of time. This can be done pending hearing of applications for return of such vehicles.
6.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions, I direct release of the petition mentioned vehicle subject to the following conditions : a) The petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) in favour of the Superintendent, Government Observation Home, No.164, Kamarajar Salai, Madurai - 625 009, in Bank Account Number : 161401000024282, IFSC Code : IOBA0001614, Indian Overseas Bank, Teppakulam. It will be a non refundable payment.
b) The Superintendent of the Observation Home is directed to spend the said amount for the welfare of the institution or that of its inmates or towards the rehabilitation of its former inmates. The Superintendent shall submit a report to the Registrar (Administration), Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai indicating the exact deployment of funds. The bills and other relevant materials will be enclosed along with the report. The Chairman, Juvenile Justice Board, Madurai will oversee the process and ensure the end-use.
c) The petitioner shall not alienate or encumber the vehicle in question till the proceedings are completed.
d) The petitioner shall produce all the documents pertaining to the ownership of the seized vehicle. If the petitioner concerned is an agreement holder and the R.C book is with the financier, he or she 2/4
can be permitted to produce the photocopies of the relevant documents and if the vehicle is a new one, sales invoice can be produced.
e) As and when the respondents call for the vehicle for enquiry, the petitioner has to produce the vehicle in question and shall cooperate with the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.
7.After completion of the aforesaid formalities, the respondents shall release the petition mentioned vehicle forthwith without any delay. If the undertaking given by the petitioner is breached, the petitioner will not be entitled to interim release of the vehicle in future and the order passed by this Court will stand recalled and the vehicle in question will be taken back to custody and it will be released only after getting orders from this Court on such terms as this Court may deem it fit to impose. 8.The Writ Petition is allowed accordingly.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) skm Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To:
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy Revenue Division, Trichy.
2.The Assistant Director of Mines and Minerals, Trichy District, Trichy.
3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office of Thiruverumbur, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District.
3/4
Copy to:
1.The Superintendent, Government Observation Home, No.164, Kamarajar Salai, Madurai - 625 009. 2.The Registrar (Administration), Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai.
3. The Chairman, Juvenile Justice Board, Madurai.
+1 CC to SGP ( SR-1653[F] dated 21/01/2021 ) W.P.(MD)No.19501 of 2020 20.01.2021 KM (02.02.2021) 4P 8C 4/4