Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15422/2020allowed

L.Jai Shankar v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-22Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.15422 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15422 of 2020 1)L.Jai Shankar 2)J.Manimegalai 3)Vinothraja ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 vs.

1)The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District.

(Crime No.39 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant 2)Ezhil Roseline ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the entire records pertaining to the case in Crime No.39 of 2019 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District and quash the same as against the petitioners.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Anand For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the entire records pertaining to the case in Crime No.39 of 2019 registered under Sections 120(b), 406, 420 and 506(i) IPC, on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District and quash the same as against the petitioners. 2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioner/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the complaint and therefore, the petitioner would pray for quashing the FIR in Crime No.39 of 2019.

3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel and the 1st respondent/police are personally present before this Court and the defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.15422 of 2020 4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the impugned FIR in Crime No.39 of 2019 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District, is quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) bala ENCL : Xerox copy of Joint Compromise Memo.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1)The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District.

2)The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15422 of 2020 DATED : 22.12.2020 NS(CO) KK(31.12.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2