← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8210/2016disposed of

M.Saravanan v. The Secretary To Govt.,

2017-07-25Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P.[MD].No.8210 of 2016 M.Saravanan : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Secretary to Government, Department of Municipal Administration, And Water Supply and Sewage, Fort. St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director of Municipal Administration, Office of the Directorate of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

3.The Secretary to Government, Department of Highways and Minor Ports, Fort. St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

4.The Secretary to Government, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fort. St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

5.The Secretary to Government, Department of Public Works, Fort. St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

: Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to impose relevant conditions prescribed in clause 6.3 and 9.4 of IRC: SP: 63-2004 Guidelines for the use of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement and also as per the Indian Standards (IS) Norms for using which should be used in the paver block roads in the terms and conditions on the contract agreement entering into between the respondents and the contractors.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

*********** [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice.] Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader for Respondents. 2.In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has sought a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to impose conditions prescribed in Clause 6.3 and 9.4 of 'IRC: SP: 63-2004 guidelines for the use of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement' and also as per the Indian Standards (IS) Norms for using the paver blocks. In terms of the contract agreement entered into by the respondents and the contractors, this Writ Petition cannot be construed as a Public Interest. More so, on the basis of the averments in the writ petition, the petitioner himself is a Civil Engineer, a Contractor and user of the Interlocking Concrete Block. The remedy, if any, of the petitioner against any substandard concrete blocks lies by way of initiation of a suit / such other appropriate proceedings, as the petitioner may be advised.

3.This Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government, Department of Municipal Administration, And Water Supply and Sewage, Fort. St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director of Municipal Administration, Office of the Directorate of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

3.The Secretary to Government, Department of Highways and Minor Ports, Fort. St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

4.The Secretary to Government, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fort. St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

5.The Secretary to Government, Department of Public Works, Fort. St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

+1cc to THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER in SR. No.68338 +1cc to Mr.M.THIRUNAVUKKARASU Advocate in SR. No.67473 AR/SSS JS/MR.KKR/SAR2/3.8.2017/2P-8C ORDER MADE IN W.P.[MD].No.8210 of 2016 25.07.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/