← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11855/2026granted

Sivakarthick v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By

2026-06-22Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 22/06/2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Sivakarthick ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Perunkudi Police Station, Madurai District.

Crime No.68 of 2026.

... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.68 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muniyandi, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu (Crl.Side) ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / A1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.04.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 103 & 127(2) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.68 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

1/6

2. The case of the prosecution A1 is the brother of the deceased and A2 is the mother of A1 and deceased. As the deceased was drunkard , spendthrift and womanizer, the mother and brother of the deceased felt deeply ashamed of his conduct and finally on 26.04.2026 at about 6.30 pm., A1 and A2 have decided to kill him. A2 caught hold of the deceased and A1 put up the grinding stone on his brother , which resulted in his death. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner has no previous case and he has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.04.2026. Therefore, prayed to grant bail for the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the offence committed by the petitioner is grave in nature. He would further submit that investigation is pending. 2/6

Hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. He would further submit that the petitioner has no previous case.

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, nature of offence, and no previous case is pending against the petitioner and FIR was registered on 27.04.2026, by this time, the material part of the investigation might have been completed and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner and also the fact that co-accused was granted by this Court, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent 3/6

police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

4/6

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 22.06.2026 aav To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam.

2.The Inspector of Police, Perunkudi Police Station, Madurai District.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL,J aav

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11855 of 2026 Date : 22/06/2026 6/6