Periyamurugan v. The Superintendent Of Police
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15988 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.10.2021 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15988 of 2021 1.Periyamurugan 2.Chinnamurugan 3.Muthukaruppan 4.Ramasamy ... Petitioners Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District.
3.Kaleeswari ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners and their family members under the guise of enquiry.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Karthik For Respondents : Mr.R.M.S.Sethuraman for R1 & R2 Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking direction to the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners and their family members in the guise of enquiry.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that based upon the complaint given by the third respondent, enquiry was undertaken in CSR.No.810 of 2021 and during the course of enquiry, it was found that it is a property dispute between the parties, in respect of which a suit is also pending before the Sub Court, Palani in A.S.No.15 of 2021. Hence, the complaint was closed on 25.09.2021. Hence, there is no harassment at the hands of the second respondent police. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15988 of 2021 3.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and recording the closure report, this criminal original petition is disposed of as infructuous. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS III) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.S.KARTHIK, Advocate ( SR-32478[F] dated 25/10/2021 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15988 of 2021 22.10.2021 MGJ/PM(17.11.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2