Madras High CourtWP Crl.(MD)/3311/2026disposed of

A.S.Vijay Babu v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. By The Superintendent Of Police

2026-06-19Honourable Mrs Justice L.Victoria Gowri5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 19/06/2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI A.S.Vijay Babu ... Petitioner Vs

1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep., By the Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.

2. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep., By the Inspector of Police,, District Crime Branch, Madurai, Madurai District.

3. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep., By the Inspector of Police,, Economic Offences Wing, Madurai, Madurai District.

4. Anand

5. Nithya

6. Nandhavanam ... Respondents 1/5

PRAYER :- To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 1 to 3, particularly the 2nd respondent to take appropriate legal action on the petitioners complaint dated 02.05.2026.

For Petitioner : Mr.R. Murugappan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 1 to 3, particularly the 2nd respondent to take appropriate legal action on the petitioners complaint dated 02.05.2026.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had sent a representation seeking to take action against the respondents 4 to 6, who have cheated the petitioner by receiving a sum of Rs.19,70,000/- and giving a false promise of arranging job to the petitioner in abroad. However, no proper action was taken, and therefore, this petition was filed.

2/5

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the petitioner's complaint has not been received by the respondent police.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the respondents 4 to 6, notice to them is dispensed with.

5. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), the petitioner is directed to give a fresh complaint to the respondent police. If any complaint is received, the third respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.05.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3/5

6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 19.06.2026 NCC : Yes / no Index : Yes / no pnn To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.

2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai, Madurai District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Madurai, Madurai District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

L. VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

pnn

ORDER

IN WP CRL.(MD) No.3311 of 2026 Date : 19/06/2026 5/5