Arumuga Krishnan v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 22/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Arumuga Krishnan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep., By the Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

Crime No. 227/2026..

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Veerapandiselvaraj For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 227 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. 1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.05.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3) of BNS and Section 25(1-A) of Arms Act in Crime No. 227 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 28.04.2026 at about 12.15 hours, when the defacto complainant was proceedings to his house, the accused persons came behind him with dangerous weapons and criminally intimidated him and further some of the accused also raised accelerator of their vehicles. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail and he has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.05.2026. Therefore, prayed to grant bail for the petitioner. 2/6

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that based on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, the case has been registered against the accused persons. The petitioner is a history sheeted rowdy having 6 previous cases. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature and hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the nature of the offence and the fact that nobody injured in this case and further considering the fact that though the petitioner is a history sheeted rowdy and having 6 previous cases to his credit, he has already been granted bail in those cases, as well as taking into account of the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner and the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: 3/6

[a] Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivakasi, and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days, thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

4/6

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 22.06.2026 PNM TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivakasi.

2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Virudhunagar.

3. The Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL,J PNM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11859 of 2026 Date : 22/06/2026 6/6