Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15730/2020allowed

Gnanaraj v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-12-23Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.15730 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15730 of 2020 1)Gnanraj 2)Vibins Kumar 3)Lawrence Kirubaharan 4)Jegan 5)Jackson Gnana Prakash 6)Issac David 7)Jegatheesh 8)Willson ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 8 vs.

1)The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Valliyoor Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.145 of 2017) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2)Rajadurai ... 2nd Respondent/defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for entire records pertaining to the case in C.C.No.81 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District and quash the same in respect of the petitioners.

For Petitioners : Mr.A.Kesavan For R1 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for entire records pertaining to the case in C.C.No.81 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District and quash the same in respect of the petitioners. 2.The second respondent / defacto complainant, as well as the petitioners/accused are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed a joint compromise memo stating that the matter has been amicably resolved between themselves and the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the case and therefore, the petitioners would pray for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.81 of 2020.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C rl.O.P.(MD)No.15730 of 2020 3.The compromise memo is filed before this Court and the parties along with their respective counsel are also personally present before this Court today and the defacto complainant has represented before this Court that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor who was present in the Court had also verified their identity and would state that he has no objection for the above compromise.

4.In the result, by recording the compromise, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the proceedings in in C.C.No.81 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District, are quashed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P & A) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ENCL.: XEROX COPY OF JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO.

bala Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1)The Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District 2)The Inspector of Police, The Inspector of Police, Valliyoor Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

3)The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ORDER MADE IN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15730 of 2020 DATED : 23.12.2020 ck(CO) TR(07.01.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2