Duraipandi v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD).Nos.3248 and 3249 of 2019 Duraipandi ... Petitioner versus The Commissioner, Periyakulam Municipality Periyakulam, Theni District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned tender notice in Na.Ka.No.218/2018/A2 dated 02.02.2018 and quash the same insofar as 1st item therein is concerned and consequently, direct the respondent herein to continue the lease granted in favour of the petitioner till 31.03.2020 by receiving the dues and further lease amount from the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Appadurai For Respondents : Mr.M.Karuppasamypandian 1/3

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 04.12.2023 ssb NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

To The Commissioner, Periyakulam Municipality Periyakulam, Theni District.

2/3

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ssb 04.12.2023 3/3