Vadivel v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.08.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Vadivel

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to grant permission and protection to conduct the ''Aadalum Paadalum'' dance programme on 07.09.2022 from 08.00 p.m. to 11.00 p.m. in pursuant to the Avani festival of Arulmigu ''Sri Manthaimariamman'' Temple situated at Palani Valasai, Siddarkottai, Ramanathapuram District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.08.2022.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthikumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) 1/5

ORDER

The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to grant permission and protection to conduct the ''Aadalum Paadalum'' dance programme on 07.09.2022 from 08.00 p.m. to 11.00 p.m. in connection with the Avani festival of Arulmigu ''Sri Manthaimariamman'' Temple situated at Palani Valasai, Siddarkottai, Ramanathapuram District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.08.2022. 2.Mr.M.Sakthikumar, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that temple festival, by name, ''Sri Manthaimariamman'' Temple situated at Palani Valasai, Siddarkottai, Ramanathapuram District, is going to be held on 07.09.2022. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 12.08.2022. But the respondent police has not considered the said representation.

petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief. 4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the respondent police has received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.

5.I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.

6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019 dated 09.04.2019 along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.08.2022 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular. 3/5

7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

26.08.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No vsd To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

V.SIVAGNANAM., J vsd 26.08.2022 5/5