G.Arumaidurai, v. Managing Director,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P(MD)Nos.3535, 3538 and 3539 of 2018 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.3668, 3673, 3674, 3675 & 3676 of 2018 and W.P(MD)Nos.18241 and 18246 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.14675, 14676, 14686 and 14687 of 2018 G.Arumaidurai ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.3535/2018 T.Velayutham ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.3538/2018 K.Ramesh ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.3539/2018 R.Pragadeeswaran ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.18241/2017 K.Kasi Raman ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.18246/2017 Vs.
1.Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., Chennai.
2.The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., Trichy.
3.District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., Thanjavoor. ... Respondents in all W.Ps. 1/7
PRAYER in W.P(MD)No.3535 of 2018 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orders 1.Na.Ka.No.7805/R.V.2/2017 dated 23.06.2017 of the third respondent 2.Mu.Mu.No 2276/17(U) dated 17.08.2017 of the second respondent and 3.The impugned order Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.R1/12854/2017 dated 16.11.2017 of the first respondent in respect of this petitioner and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service, back wages and with all monetary benefits according to law.
PRAYER in W.P(MD)No.3538 of 2018 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orders 1.Na.Ka.No.8095/2016/R.V.2 dated 06.02.2017 of the third respondent and 2.MU.MU/.No.2338/17(e) dated 30.08.2017 of the second respondent in respect of the petitioner and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service, back wages and with all other monetary benefits according to law.
PRAYER in W.P(MD)No.3539 of 2018 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orders 1.Na.Ka.7823/2016/RV2, dated 23.06.2017 on the file of the third 2/7
respondent and 2.Order No.Mu.Mu.No.2402/17(e) dated 08.12.2017 on the file of the second respondent in respect of the petitioner and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service, back wages and with all other monetary benefits according to law.
PRAYER in W.P(MD)No.18241 of 2018 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orders 1.Na.Ka.No.8011/2016/R.V.2 dated 30.06.2017 of the third respondent and 2.Mu.Mu.No.2275/17 (e) dated 04.09.2017 of second respondent in respect of the petitioner and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service, back wages and with all other monetary benefits according to law.
PRAYER in W.P(MD)No.18246 of 2018 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orders 1.Na.Ka.No.8012/2016/R.V.2 dated 30.06.2017 of the third respondent and 2.MU.MU/.No.2429/17(e) dated 04.09.2017 of the second respondent in respect of the petitioner and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service, back wages and with all other monetary benefits according to law.
3/7
(In all the W.Ps) For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kubendran for Mr.D.Anandan For Respondents : Mr.H.Arumugam COMMON ORDER These Writ Petitions are filed to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orders passed by the respondents in respect of the petitioners and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioners with continuity of service, back wages and with all other monetary benefits according to law.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were employees of the TASMAC in different shops and they were dismissed from service on various dates. Challenging the dismissal orders, the present writ petitions have been filed. He would further submit that similarly placed persons that of the petitioners were subsequently reinstated in service. Hence, this Court may grant liberty to the petitioners to approach the respondents by way of representation. 4/7
3. In view of the above submissions, this Court, without interfering with the orders impugned in these writ petitions, is inclined to grant liberty to the petitioners to workout the remedy in the manner known to law.
4. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed with the above liberty. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
10.02.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No cp 5/7
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
cp W.P.(MD)Nos.3535 of 2018(etc., batch) 10.02.2023 6/7
7/7