← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/19495/2020allowed

Yogananth v. The District Collector

2021-01-22Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.01.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Yogananth : Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Collectorate Building, Kanyakumari.

2.The Inspector of Police, Suchindram Police Station, Suchindram, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Anjugramam Police Station, Anjugramam, Kanyakumari District.

4.Walson Boss : Respondents PRAYER :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents Police to release the petitioner's Heavy Vehicle bearing registration No.TN 72-CY-2658 (JCB -MMV Vehicle) seized on 19.12.2020, within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner :

Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan For Respondents :

Mr.S.Angappan Government Advocate

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner claims to be the owner of the petition mentioned vehicle. The petitioner's counsel states that till date the vehicle in question has not been produced before the jurisdictional court.

3.It has been held time and again that keeping the vehicle in the custody of the respondents is not going to serve any purpose. On the other hand, it will contribute to loss of value. Even though a criminal case has been registered, the vehicle in question is yet to be produced before the jurisdictional Court. The case is still under investigation. Therefore, the Writ Court will always have the power to direct release of vehicle.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the vehicle has not been involved in any previous case of the same nature. He also submitted that the petitioner is also not having 1/3

any previous case.

5.The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2002) 10 SCC 283 (Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai and Others V. State of Gujarat) has held as follows:- "17.In our view, whatever be the situation, it is of no use to keep such seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period. It is for the Magistrate to pass appropriate orders immediately by taking appropriate bond and guarantee as well as security for return of the said vehicles, if required at any point of time. This can be done pending hearing of applications for return of such vehicles.

6.The petitioner's counsel states that the the petition mentioned vehicle has been used to dumb the demolished waste/building dust as per the instruction of the fourth respondent.

7. Therefore, I refrain from imposing any cost. Recording the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner on instruction, I direct release of the petition mentioned vehicle subject to the following conditions :

a) The petitioner shall not alienate or encumber the vehicle in question till the proceedings are completed.

b) The petitioner shall produce all the documents pertaining to the ownership of the seized vehicle. If the petitioner concerned is an agreement holder and the R.C book is with the financier, he or she can be permitted to produce the photocopies of the relevant documents and if the vehicle is a new one, sales invoice can be produced.

c) As and when the respondents call for the vehicle for enquiry, the petitioner has to produce the vehicle in question and shall cooperate with the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.

8.After completion of the aforesaid formalities, the respondents shall release the petition mentioned vehicle forthwith without any delay. If the undertaking given by the petitioner is breached, the petitioner will not be entitled to interim release of the vehicle in future and the order passed by this Court will stand recalled and the vehicle in question will be taken back to custody and it will be released only after getting orders from this Court on such terms as this Court may deem it fit to impose. 2/3

9.The Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cmr To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Building, Kanyakumari.

2.The Inspector of Police, Suchindram Police Station, Suchindram, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Anjugramam Police Station, Anjugramam, Kanyakumari District.

+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-2016[F] dated 25/01/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.P.M.VISHNU VARTHANAN, Advocate ( SR-2083[F] dated 25/01/2021 ) 22.01.2021 (NS)CO AP(29/01/2021) 3 P 6C 3/3