← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15371/2022ordered

P.Sakthivel v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-08-26Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26.08.2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR P.Sakthivel ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Vengamedu Police Station, Karur District.

(Crime No.216 of 2022) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vanchinathan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.P.kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.216 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(2) IPC r/w Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.216 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, who is the son-in-law of the defacto complainant, had used abusive language against the defacto complainant and her husband. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the injured was already discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that the petitioner is not having any previous case.

5.Considering the facts that there existed matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant's daughter, that 1/3

the injured was already discharged from the hospital, that the petitioner is not having any previous case and that except the offences under Sections 506(2) IPC and 4 of Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women Harassment Act, all other offences are bailable in nature, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 26/08/2022 / TRUE COPY / /09/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

2/3

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KARUR.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENGAMEDU POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.S.VANCHINATHAN, Advocate ( SR-9239[I] dated 29/08/2022 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15371 of 2022 Date :26/08/2022 CSM RS/VR/SAR.4 (06.09.2022) 3P-6C 3/3