Madras High CourtWP(MD)/4658/2018dismissed as infructuous

F.Edwin Sridhar, S/O.Francis v. The Commissioner,

2022-02-08Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan2 pages

No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.02.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.(MD) Nos.4658 & 4659 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.4727 & 4728 of 2018 F.Edwin Sridhar ... Petitioner in both W.Ps., /vs/ 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600034 2.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Executive Officer Office, Incorporated and Unincorporated Kanyakumari Devaswom, Suseenthiram, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Manager, Arulmigu Bhagavathi Amman Thirukoil, Mandaikadu, Kanyakumari District.

... Respondents in both W.Ps., PRAYER in W.P.(MD) No.4658 of 2018:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein not to evict the petitioner from the shop from selling articles like hand, leg, head along with Cradle inside the temple premises of Arulmigu Bhagavathi Amman Temple, Mandaikadu, Kanyakumari District without following the provision of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959. PRAYER in W.P.(MD) No.4659 of 2018:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein not to evict the petitioner from the shop from running Flower Stall inside the temple premises of Arulmigu Bhagavathi Amman Temple, Mandaikadu, Kanyakumari District without following the provision of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, For Petitioner in both W.Ps., : Mr.H.Velavadhas, Advocate For R1 in both W.Ps., : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader For R2 & R3 in both W.Ps., : Mr.K.Sathiyasingh, Advocate COMMON ORDER Mr.H.Velavadhas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in both the writ petitions submits that the prayer sought for in these writ petitions has now become infructuous. 2.Recording such submission, the Writ Petitions stand dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (A.D I) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To:

The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600034 +1 CC to M/s.K.SATHIYA SINGH, Advocate (SR-5085[F] dated 09/02/2022) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-5012[F] dated 09/02/2022 ) W.P.(MD) Nos.4658 & 4659 of 2018 08.02.2022 RS(17.02.2022) 2P-4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2