Jeyam @ Jeyaran v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.04.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN 1.Jeyam @ Jeyaraj 2.Logu @ Logeshwaran 3.Ashokk @ Ashok Kumar 4.Minor Santhosh rep. by his father Mr.Selvam 5.Murali @ Jegadeeshwaran Rep. by his father Mr.Sivakumar ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station, Madurai District.

(Crime No.811 of 2020) 2.Rathika ... Respondents PRAYER:- Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.811 of 2020 on the file of the 1st respondent Police and quash the same as against the petitioners. For Petitioner : Mr.K.K. Samy For respondent No.1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor For 2nd respondent : Mr.K.Raghul Priyan 1/5

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.811 of 2020 on the file of the 1st respondent Police as against the petitioners.

2. The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.811 of 2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 427, 323, 324, 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 against the petitioners.

3. The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels. 4.The petitioners and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor 2/5

(Crl. Side) and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 16.09.2020, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, all further proceedings in Crime No.811 of 2020 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police is quashed and the compromise memo is recorded.

6. In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.811 of 2020, pending on the file of the 1st respondent police is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order. 17.04.2024 Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order trp 3/5

To

1. The Inspector of Police, Usilampatti Town Police Station, Madurai District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.

Trp 17.04.2024 5/5