Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6224/2018dismissed as infructuous

P.Muthusamy v. The Superintending Engineer

2024-06-21Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.06.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN P.Muthusamy ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, (TANGEDCO), Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2.The Executive Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, (TANGEDCO), Dindigul North, Dindigul District.

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, (TANGEDCO), Gugiliyamparai, Dindigul District.

4.The Assistant Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, (TANGEDCO), 1/4

Palayam, Vedasandhur Taluk, Dindigul District.

5.M.Sankar 6.M.Veeramalai ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents No.1 to 4 to take appropriate action by way of disconnecting the Electricity Service Connection No.05-218-015-302 standing in the name of the 6th Respondent as per the procedures contemplated under Section 126 of Electricity Act r/w. Rule 19 of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, 2004 on the basis of the Petitioner's Representation dated 08.03.2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balaji For R1 to R4 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel

ORDER

Mr.V.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous, as the electricity connection given to the sixth respondent has been disconnected on 02.08.2021. 2/4

2.Recording the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Index : Yes / No 21.06.2024 Internet : Yes / No mm 3/4

C.SARAVANAN, J.

mm 21.06.2024 4/4