Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16290/2021disposed of

Lourdusamy v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-10-26Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16290 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.10.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16290 of 2021 1.Lourdusamy 2.L.John Britto 3.L.Jansi Rani ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul.

3.Chinnasamy ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute in respect of Doc.Nos.1958/2018, 1502/2019, 937/2020 , 1008/2020 and 1501/2020 which were registered with Sub-Registrar, Sathirappatti, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District.

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Mohan For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking direction to the the second respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute in respect of Doc.Nos.1958/2018, 1502/2019, 937/2020 , 1008/2020 and 1501/2020 which were registered with Sub-Registrar, Sathirappatti, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District.

2.The case of the petitioners is that the third respondent herein sold his property through four separate sale deeds dated 12.11.2018, 20.09.2019, 20.08.2020 & 27.08.2020 to the first and second petitioners. But he has lodged the forged complaint. Based upon which the second respondent harassed the petitioners to settle the issue.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16290 of 2021 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that based upon the complaint given by the third respondent enquiry was undertaken in C.No.256 of 2021 and both the parties appeared before the Enquiry Officer and they undertook to settle the issue. 4.But however, reading of the complaint shows that the third respondent is stating that he has executed a sale deed only for the loan obtained by him. It appears that it is a money dispute between the third respondent and the petitioners. The second respondent has no role to enquire this issue. Hence, he can close the issue very well, by advising the parties to approach appropriate civil Court.

5.With the above directions, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16290 of 2021 26.10.2021 RK/PM(24/11/2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2