← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/19199/2025dismissed

R.Pandiarajan v. The District Collector

2025-07-16Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.07.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.(MD)No.19199 of 2025 R.Pandiarajan

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Trichy District, Trichy.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srirangam, 4.The Tahsildar, Manaparai Taluk Office, Manaparai, 5.R.Ellammal 6.Nithya 7.Kannan 1/6

8.A.Narayanasamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent herein to cancel the patta on the name of the 5th and 6th respondents herein and issue the patta in favour of the petitioner with regard to property in Survey No.70/1 and 70/2 situated at Nadupatti Village, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District based on his representation dated 14.10.2024.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gomathisankar For Respondents : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4

ORDER

The Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to cancel the patta issued in the name of the private respondents 5 and 6 and issue patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of the property situated in Survey Nos.70/1 and 70/2 in Nadupatti Village, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District, by considering his representation dated 14.10.2024.

2. Heard the arguments of Mr.G.Gomathisankar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional 2/6

Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4. By consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. According to the petitioner, the private respondents are claiming right over the subject property under various registered documents mentioned in the representation. The registered documents relied on by the private respondents are fraudulent documents. Therefore, he submitted a representation before the third respondent seeking cancellation of the registered documents and consequential order for cancellation of the revenue documents, which were issued based on the registered documents. The same has not been considered. Hence, the petitioner has come before this Court.

4. Even as per the averments of the petitioner in the representation submitted by him, the private respondents are claiming right over the property under registered documents. The Revenue Officials are not entitled to decide about the fraudulent nature of the registered document. Unless the petitioner gets a declaration from the civil Court with regard 3/6

to the invalidity of the registered documents, the Revenue Officials may not be in a position to ignore those registered documents and cancel the patta issued to the private respondents based on the registered documents. In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to issue any direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy before the competent civil Court. No costs.

16.07.2025 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No csm To 1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Trichy District, Trichy.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srirangam, 4/6

4.The Tahsildar, Manaparai Taluk Office, Manaparai, 5/6

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

csm Order made in W.P.(MD)No.19199 of 2025 Dated : 16.07.2025 6/6