Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13986/2014closed

K.Thilagavathy v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-06-25Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and Crl.M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 K.Thilagavathy : Petitioner/LW-9 Vs.

1.The Inspector of Police, Thirukokarnam Police Station, Pudukottai District.

[In Crime No.352 of 2009] ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Panneer 3.Moorthy 4.Singam @Singaravelan 5.Gangadharan 6.Raju @ Rajukumar 7.Chelladurai 8.Murugesan @ Murugan 9.Mari 10.Ravi @ Loganathan 11.Panchu @ Panchasaram 12.Siva @ Sivalingam ... Respondents 2 to 12/Accused Nos.3 to 13 13.The Government Advocate (Crl Side) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

[R-13 suo motu impleaded vie order dated 23.07.2014] 14.State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Home Secretary, Fort St.George, Chennai.

15.The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai -4.

16.Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi.

1/3

17.Law Commission of India, New Delhi.

:Respondents [R-14 to R17 were suo-motu impleaded vide order dated 25.08.2014] Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to withdraw the case in S.C.No.152 of 2011 pending on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai and to transfer the same to the file of any other competent Court in any other district.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar For Respondent : Mr.S.Ravi, Nos.1,13 to 15 Standing Counsel for the State For Respondent : Mr.T.Vadivelan Nos.2 and 6 For Respondent : No appearance Nos.3 to 5 & 7 to 12

ORDER

This criminal original petition is filed seeking for a direction to withdraw the case in S.C.No.152 of 2011 from the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai and to transfer the same to the file of any other competent Court. 2.Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this petition has become infructuous and he also undertook to circulate a letter to the Registry to that effect.

3.In view of the submission of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this criminal original petition is closed as infructuous.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) dsk NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. 2/3

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Thirukokarnam Police Station, Pudukottai District.

2. The Government Advocate (CRL Side) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3.The Home Secretary, Fort St.George, Chennai.

4.The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai -4.

5.The Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi.

6.The Law Commission of India, New Delhi.

Copy to 1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai.

25.06.2021 SRK(CO) TR(08.07.2021) 3P 8C 3/3