← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/20578/2025disposed of

C.Vasanthakumar v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2025-07-29Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.07.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.(MD).No.20578 of 2025 C.Vasanthakumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District - 625 020.

2. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai - 625 020.

3. C.V.Samy ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to effect mutation of Town Survey Land Register for the petitioner's respective shares as per the Registered Partition Deed dated 26.11.1977 by considering my representation dated 04.07.2025.

1/6

For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Pavithra for Haja Mohideen For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Gangatharam Government Advocate

ORDER

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to effect mutation of Town Survey Land Register pertains to the subject property by considering the petitioner's representation dated 04.07.2025.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Gangatharam, learned Government Advocate who takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2.

3. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2/6

4. The petitioner claims that the subject property in Old Town Survey No.71/2PT, and New Survey No.4/2 belongs to him and his brother as per the recitals in the registered Partition Deed dated 26.11.1977.

5. The petitioner submitted a representation on 04.07.2025 before the respondents 1 and 2 seeking mutation of revenue records. Based on the above said Partition Deed, the same has not been considered. Hence, the petitioner has come before this Court.

6. The learned Government Advocate who takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 04.07.2025, will be considered in accordance with law.

7. In view of the same, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.07.2015 and pass final orders on its own merits, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of 3/6

this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner, 3rd respondent and the legal heirs of the other brother of the petitioner namely Thirumalai.

8. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. No costs.

29.07.2025 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No rgm 4/6

To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District - 625 020.

2. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai - 625 020.

5/6

S.SOUNTHAR , J.

rgm W.P.(MD).No.20578 of 2025 29.07.2025 6/6