Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6966/2018dismissed as infructuous

Arpudhamary, v. The Principal Secretary To

2019-07-18Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.(MD)No.6966 of 2018 Arpudhamary : Petitioner

Versus

1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.

2. The Inspector General of Prisons/ADGP Prisons, Office of the Inspector General of Prisons, CMDA Towers, Egmore, Chennai-8.

3. The District Collector and District Magistrate, Office of the District Collector and District Magistrate, Dindigul District.

4. The Superintendent of Prison, Dindigul District Prison, Dindigul District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Dindigul South Police Station, Dindigul District.

: Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to provide best treatment by specialist doctors to my husband by name Amalraj, son of Antony, aged 48, now confining at Dindugul District Prison in Government or private hospital till his recovery by considering the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 21.03.2018, within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan, Additional Public Prosecutor ***** https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

Today, when the Writ Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submitted that the relief sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the present Writ Petition.

2. Recording the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To