K. Nagaraj v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Tenth day of September Two Thousand and Nineteen PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN AND The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH (in the matter of SNEKA, D/O.K.NAGARAJ, FEMALE, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) K. Nagaraj ... Petitioner Vs 1 The Superintendent of police, Ramanathapuram. 2 The Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram district.
3 Dinesh 4 Sivaji 5 Navamani ... Respondents Prayer in Habeas Corpus Petition(MD) No. 910 of 2019 : Habeas Corpus Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to secure the detenu and produce the body or person of the detenu, viz.,Sneka, D/o.K.Nagaraj, aged 16 years before this Honble court, illegally detained by the 3rd respondent and handover the custody of the detenu to the petitioner forthwith. To R3 Dinesh, S/o.Sivaji, Kalliyadiyenthal Village,, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
1/3
R4 Sivaji, S/o.Arumugam, Kalliyadiyenthal Village,, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
R5 Navamani, W/o.Sivaji, Kalliyadiyenthal Village,, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
(With copies of petition and affidavit for each) Through : THE PEINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANATHAPURAM (Res.3 to 5) (in duplicate, with copies for immediate service and return with covering letter) Whereas upon Motion this day made unto this Court by Mr. G.THIRUVARUTSELVAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of K.DINESH BABU, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents 1 and 2 and the Advocate for the petitioner praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to secure the detenu and produce the body or person of the detenu, viz.,Sneka, D/o.K.Nagaraj, aged 16 years before this Honble court, illegally detained by the 3rd respondent and hand Whereas this Court hath directed issue of notice, returnable by the Monday the Sixteenth day of September, Two Thousand and Ninteen (16/09/2019) to the respondents 3 to 5 herein to show cause why this petition should not be complied with:
Now take notice that you, namely R3 Dinesh, S/o.Sivaji, Kalliyadiyenthal Village,, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
R4 Sivaji, S/o.Arumugam, Kalliyadiyenthal Village,, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
R5 Navamani, W/o.Sivaji, Kalliyadiyenthal Village,, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
The respondents 3 to 5 herein are hereby directed to appear in person or by an Advocate before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai at 10.30 a.m on Monday the Sixteenth day of September, Two Thousand and Ninteen (16/09/2019) to show cause why this petition should not be complied with.
HEREIN FAIL NOT, WITNESS the Hon'ble SHRIMATI. VIJAYA KAMLESH TAHILRAMANI, The Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Madras on Tuesday, 2/3
the Tenth day of September Two Thousand and Nineteen. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ORDER DATED : 10/09/2019 HEARING DATE : 16/09/2019 ========================== NOTICE ========================== JMN(12.09.2019) 3P : 5C 3/3