← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/17483/2026disposed of

A.Balan v. The District Collector,

2026-06-23Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.06.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY A.Balan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

2.The Personal Assistant to District Collector (Development), Collectorate Campus, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

3.The Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Sivgangai, Sivagangai District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to regularize the petitioner's service in the post of Medical Attender from 09.07.2007 to 13.07.2016 and in the light of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No. 11290 of 2017 dated 12.03.2021 in terms of Rule 54(B)(9) of the Tamil Nadu 1/5

Fundamental Rules and in the light of proposal forwarded by the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.P5/7054/2016 dated 22.12.2025 to the first respondent and by considering the petitioner's representation dated 04.06.2026 within the period stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Ms.K.Porkodi counsel for State

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to regularize the petitioner's service in the post of Medical Attender for the period from 09.07.2007 to 13.07.2026.

2.However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the respondents have already regularized the petitioner's service, but the consequential monetary benefits have not been paid.

2/5

3.The learned counsel for the State, appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner was facing criminal proceedings and, therefore, the monetary benefits could not be disbursed.

4.It is seen that the petitioner has been acquitted in the criminal proceedings. It is further submitted that the State has preferred a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India. 5.Therefore, without going into the merits of the case, the respondents are directed to consider and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, regarding the petitioner's entitlement to the monetary benefits, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3/5

6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

23.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

2.The Personal Assistant to District Collector (Development), Collectorate Campus, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

3.The Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Sivgangai, Sivagangai District.

4/5

S.SRIMATHY, J.

ps Order made in 23.06.2026 5/5